<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BG 163: Can Dharma Help us Turn the Corner?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/</link>
	<description>Discover the Emerging Face(s) of Buddhism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Spiritual Teachers Be Jerks? ~ Angela Raines &#124; elephant journal</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3327</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Spiritual Teachers Be Jerks? ~ Angela Raines &#124; elephant journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 02:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3327</guid>
		<description>[...] be clear, Andrew Cohen doesn&#8217;t call himself a teacher, but a guru. As Terry Patten explains in a fantastic conversation on Buddhist Geeks, these two roles are worlds apart: If I’m a teacher of one kind, I try to model [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be clear, Andrew Cohen doesn&#8217;t call himself a teacher, but a guru. As Terry Patten explains in a fantastic conversation on Buddhist Geeks, these two roles are worlds apart: If I’m a teacher of one kind, I try to model [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoelG</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3326</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3326</guid>
		<description>&quot;What can be done directly, starting from Dharma itself, is reformation of sanghas and institutions to move beyond those exclusive-value-based platforms into a real developmental model, that effectively recognizes strengths and weaknesses of traditional loyalty and rigidity, modern rationality and reductionism, and postmodern inclusion and relativism. This would also assume moving beyond the sectarian and conservative impulse. Secondly, spiritual psychology must keep moving forward, and not just with interpretations, but with actually incorporating certain aspects of Western mind-sciences into our understanding and practice. This also means looking with fresh eyes at what really works in order to maximize results (which requires getting rid of the taboo surrounding realization once and for all). And thirdly, embracing an evolution-based view of universe and of our role in it, both individually and collectively. So it&#039;s institutional reform, practice recalibration, and replacing the &quot;golden past&quot; myths with sophisticated evolutionary views, as three minimum shifts that would allow us to raise the &quot;center of gravity&quot; and thus make sure spiritual practitioners are in position to take themselves seriously as agents of positive change and as cultural leaders in the world. &quot;

This is crystal-clear, Hokai. Sorry for my long-winded and overly literal response--proof that the discussion touched a nerve, no doubt!
Best regards,
Joel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What can be done directly, starting from Dharma itself, is reformation of sanghas and institutions to move beyond those exclusive-value-based platforms into a real developmental model, that effectively recognizes strengths and weaknesses of traditional loyalty and rigidity, modern rationality and reductionism, and postmodern inclusion and relativism. This would also assume moving beyond the sectarian and conservative impulse. Secondly, spiritual psychology must keep moving forward, and not just with interpretations, but with actually incorporating certain aspects of Western mind-sciences into our understanding and practice. This also means looking with fresh eyes at what really works in order to maximize results (which requires getting rid of the taboo surrounding realization once and for all). And thirdly, embracing an evolution-based view of universe and of our role in it, both individually and collectively. So it&#039;s institutional reform, practice recalibration, and replacing the &quot;golden past&quot; myths with sophisticated evolutionary views, as three minimum shifts that would allow us to raise the &quot;center of gravity&quot; and thus make sure spiritual practitioners are in position to take themselves seriously as agents of positive change and as cultural leaders in the world. &quot;</p>
<p>This is crystal-clear, Hokai. Sorry for my long-winded and overly literal response&#8211;proof that the discussion touched a nerve, no doubt!<br />
Best regards,<br />
Joel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Lama</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3325</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Lama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3325</guid>
		<description>Hokai, this is completely unrelated to the discussion on this thread, but I just wanted to point out, based on a small observation I made, that during the course of the conversation between Terry and you, you were making attempts, consciously or unconsciously, to incorporate some measure of an American accent in your speech. Perhaps, this may have to do with your stay in the US, but I must implore you not to lose the sexy &quot;Eastern European&quot; accent you have always had! Too much is at stake. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hokai, this is completely unrelated to the discussion on this thread, but I just wanted to point out, based on a small observation I made, that during the course of the conversation between Terry and you, you were making attempts, consciously or unconsciously, to incorporate some measure of an American accent in your speech. Perhaps, this may have to do with your stay in the US, but I must implore you not to lose the sexy &quot;Eastern European&quot; accent you have always had! Too much is at stake. <img src='http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hokai</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3324</link>
		<dc:creator>Hokai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3324</guid>
		<description>Hi there, and thanks for your feedback (both Joel and Marshall). Yes, the discussion did go into some specifics in the second half, on the spot with live exchanges involving audience. As far as Joel&#039;s objections are concerned, I agree in principle. However, there&#039;s a mid-level between highly specific actions and the fundamental awareness/awakening developed and sustained in formal practice. This is, imho, the crucial level and it concerns the framework or structure we enact to translate that awareness into real-world action with widespread social consequences. Both Terry and I come with strong integral elements in our thinking, and the discussion itself took place at Boulder Integral center. So, these prevailing structures are also sometimes referred to as worldviews, and generally known as traditional, modern, and postmodern, and so far have produced cultural wars on many fronts, and have definitely proven to fragment society, making any concerted effort near impossible (there are too many examples). What goes beyond these three, as an emergent, is often referred to as &quot;integral&quot;, though even that can have a rather broad connotation. What can be done directly, starting from Dharma itself,  is reformation of sanghas and institutions to move beyond those exclusive-value-based platforms into a real developmental model, that effectively recognizes strengths and weaknesses of traditional loyalty and rigidity, modern rationality and reductionism, and postmodern inclusion and relativism. This would also assume moving beyond the sectarian and conservative impulse. Secondly, spiritual psychology must keep moving forward, and not just with interpretations, but with actually incorporating certain aspects of Western mind-sciences into our understanding and practice. This also means looking with fresh eyes at what really works in order to maximize results (which requires getting rid of the taboo surrounding realization once and for all). And thirdly, embracing an evolution-based view of universe and of our role in it, both individually and collectively. So it&#039;s institutional reform, practice recalibration, and replacing the &quot;golden past&quot; myths with sophisticated evolutionary views, as three minimum shifts that would allow us to raise the &quot;center of gravity&quot; and thus make sure spiritual practitioners are in position to take themselves seriously as agents of positive change in the world. As far as ancient wisdom is concerned, whether Lao Tzu or Shantideva or anyone worth their salt, no need to discard it. But we do need to supplement, even sandals have evolved into Vibram five fingers.:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, and thanks for your feedback (both Joel and Marshall). Yes, the discussion did go into some specifics in the second half, on the spot with live exchanges involving audience. As far as Joel&#039;s objections are concerned, I agree in principle. However, there&#039;s a mid-level between highly specific actions and the fundamental awareness/awakening developed and sustained in formal practice. This is, imho, the crucial level and it concerns the framework or structure we enact to translate that awareness into real-world action with widespread social consequences. Both Terry and I come with strong integral elements in our thinking, and the discussion itself took place at Boulder Integral center. So, these prevailing structures are also sometimes referred to as worldviews, and generally known as traditional, modern, and postmodern, and so far have produced cultural wars on many fronts, and have definitely proven to fragment society, making any concerted effort near impossible (there are too many examples). What goes beyond these three, as an emergent, is often referred to as &quot;integral&quot;, though even that can have a rather broad connotation. What can be done directly, starting from Dharma itself,  is reformation of sanghas and institutions to move beyond those exclusive-value-based platforms into a real developmental model, that effectively recognizes strengths and weaknesses of traditional loyalty and rigidity, modern rationality and reductionism, and postmodern inclusion and relativism. This would also assume moving beyond the sectarian and conservative impulse. Secondly, spiritual psychology must keep moving forward, and not just with interpretations, but with actually incorporating certain aspects of Western mind-sciences into our understanding and practice. This also means looking with fresh eyes at what really works in order to maximize results (which requires getting rid of the taboo surrounding realization once and for all). And thirdly, embracing an evolution-based view of universe and of our role in it, both individually and collectively. So it&#039;s institutional reform, practice recalibration, and replacing the &quot;golden past&quot; myths with sophisticated evolutionary views, as three minimum shifts that would allow us to raise the &quot;center of gravity&quot; and thus make sure spiritual practitioners are in position to take themselves seriously as agents of positive change in the world. As far as ancient wisdom is concerned, whether Lao Tzu or Shantideva or anyone worth their salt, no need to discard it. But we do need to supplement, even sandals have evolved into Vibram five fingers.:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3323</link>
		<dc:creator>Marshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3323</guid>
		<description>Yes, thank you for your comment. I agree with you completely, every word.

So, if I have understood this discussion correctly, we should all get together and do something good to help people (as if we aren&#8217;t already both in our practice and at work). Why does that sound like a line from Zoolander? This discussion was far too vague, perhaps because they have nothing specific to propose.

Is the lack of a call to political organization in the Sutras is an oversight? Understood by that fact the Buddha lived in an antiquated age?

Are Buddhism tenants that frown on worldly life wrong? Do we now need to evolve past that?

What is &#8220;turning the corner&#8221;? Making society less selfish? And how do we endeavor to do this?

Is cushion based practice insufficient?

Am I not getting this discussion because I too have &#8220;no trace of urban awareness&#8221;?

Was Lao Tzu wrong when he advised to wear saddles rather than trying to cover the earth in leather?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, thank you for your comment. I agree with you completely, every word.</p>
<p>So, if I have understood this discussion correctly, we should all get together and do something good to help people (as if we aren&rsquo;t already both in our practice and at work). Why does that sound like a line from Zoolander? This discussion was far too vague, perhaps because they have nothing specific to propose.</p>
<p>Is the lack of a call to political organization in the Sutras is an oversight? Understood by that fact the Buddha lived in an antiquated age?</p>
<p>Are Buddhism tenants that frown on worldly life wrong? Do we now need to evolve past that?</p>
<p>What is &ldquo;turning the corner&rdquo;? Making society less selfish? And how do we endeavor to do this?</p>
<p>Is cushion based practice insufficient?</p>
<p>Am I not getting this discussion because I too have &ldquo;no trace of urban awareness&rdquo;?</p>
<p>Was Lao Tzu wrong when he advised to wear saddles rather than trying to cover the earth in leather?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Lama</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Lama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>Extremely useful and thought-provoking conversation. Thanks, Hokai, Terry and Vince!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extremely useful and thought-provoking conversation. Thanks, Hokai, Terry and Vince!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3320</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3320</guid>
		<description>More, I want more! What a wonderful conversation; if only the rest of the spiritual community would continue it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More, I want more! What a wonderful conversation; if only the rest of the spiritual community would continue it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec_S</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>Hokai and Terry bring the pain!!!

&quot;Oh, yeah, I must put more effort.&#8221; Well, what if it&#8217;s not about effort? You know, you&#8217;re not stupid, you&#8217;re not lazy. Something really real could be going on here.&quot;

I&#039;d be willing to bet there are a lot of people struggling with exactly this.

Great discussion. There is some really good material here, definitely worth contemplating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hokai and Terry bring the pain!!!</p>
<p>&quot;Oh, yeah, I must put more effort.&rdquo; Well, what if it&rsquo;s not about effort? You know, you&rsquo;re not stupid, you&rsquo;re not lazy. Something really real could be going on here.&quot;</p>
<p>I&#039;d be willing to bet there are a lot of people struggling with exactly this.</p>
<p>Great discussion. There is some really good material here, definitely worth contemplating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davybuoy</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3318</link>
		<dc:creator>davybuoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3318</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Vince, I am listening again to episodes 30-33 and getting a lot out of them. I have recently started sitting with a Soto Zen group as there is not a lot of choice in the area of Ireland I live and there is no mention of the fact that mediation only covers 2 parts of the eight fold path. I wonder sometimes is Zen Buddhism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Vince, I am listening again to episodes 30-33 and getting a lot out of them. I have recently started sitting with a Soto Zen group as there is not a lot of choice in the area of Ireland I live and there is no mention of the fact that mediation only covers 2 parts of the eight fold path. I wonder sometimes is Zen Buddhism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Rizzuto</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Rizzuto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>Nice work guys. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work guys. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VinceHorn</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3316</link>
		<dc:creator>VinceHorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3316</guid>
		<description>Good question &amp; good point.  This is the only part of this discussion, because though there was another hour, after this, of question and discussion, it was not possible to easily turn that material into another episode, due to the fact that I didn&#039;t have a media release from those who participated.  Next time, I&#039;ll plan on doing that though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question &amp; good point.  This is the only part of this discussion, because though there was another hour, after this, of question and discussion, it was not possible to easily turn that material into another episode, due to the fact that I didn&#039;t have a media release from those who participated.  Next time, I&#039;ll plan on doing that though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davybuoy</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/03/bg-163-can-dharma-help-us-turn-the-corner/#comment-3315</link>
		<dc:creator>davybuoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=561#comment-3315</guid>
		<description>Is this part one with more to come? It was very interesting, but I feel a more apt name for this episode might have been; Can cushion-based practice help us turn the corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this part one with more to come? It was very interesting, but I feel a more apt name for this episode might have been; Can cushion-based practice help us turn the corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

