<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relax, You’re Already Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/</link>
	<description>Discover the Emerging Face(s) of Buddhism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/#comment-2878</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 08:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=1618#comment-2878</guid>
		<description>Nice one Joel.

I always felt Buddhist &quot;in the head&quot; and Taoist &quot;in the heart&quot; ... very into the Buddha&#039;s words and concepts but not into Buddhist meditation (I have done several retreats, they were &quot;useful&quot; but never liked meditating as such).  On the other hand years of Tai Chi and Zhang Zhuang were natural for me.

Ultimately I squared the circle with Dzogchen - the early teachings (Garab Dorge eg) [but perhaps not the later teachings which (as always) got more complex (and &quot;Tibetan&quot;)] are a clear connector and betray the naturalness of Taoism whislt retaining the view of Buddhism.

As for the phsyios-energetic transformation sa you say it seems to need to be &quot;provoked&quot; as it were [thru&#039; a vast range of seemingly different practices - 84,000 dhamma doors] - so there is no real difference between the effort required to &quot;attain the Tao&quot; and &quot;get Nirvana&quot; [to use conventional language].

Taoism is about wu-wei not &quot;doing nothing&quot;.  To enable wu-wei one needs at first methods [this is generally very under-rated in western esp. American if I may say descriptions].

Good luck and thansk for posting :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one Joel.</p>
<p>I always felt Buddhist &quot;in the head&quot; and Taoist &quot;in the heart&quot; &#8230; very into the Buddha&#039;s words and concepts but not into Buddhist meditation (I have done several retreats, they were &quot;useful&quot; but never liked meditating as such).  On the other hand years of Tai Chi and Zhang Zhuang were natural for me.</p>
<p>Ultimately I squared the circle with Dzogchen &#8211; the early teachings (Garab Dorge eg) [but perhaps not the later teachings which (as always) got more complex (and &quot;Tibetan&quot;)] are a clear connector and betray the naturalness of Taoism whislt retaining the view of Buddhism.</p>
<p>As for the phsyios-energetic transformation sa you say it seems to need to be &quot;provoked&quot; as it were [thru&#039; a vast range of seemingly different practices - 84,000 dhamma doors] &#8211; so there is no real difference between the effort required to &quot;attain the Tao&quot; and &quot;get Nirvana&quot; [to use conventional language].</p>
<p>Taoism is about wu-wei not &quot;doing nothing&quot;.  To enable wu-wei one needs at first methods [this is generally very under-rated in western esp. American if I may say descriptions].</p>
<p>Good luck and thansk for posting <img src='http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gate</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/#comment-2877</link>
		<dc:creator>gate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=1618#comment-2877</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that, of the Asian &#039;old-time religions&#039;, Daoism is the least represented on bookstore shelves. Usually what you will find are books about the I-Ching, translations of the Tao Te Ching-- and, if it&#039;s an unusual bookstore, maybe some of the &#039;yoga&#039; of Mantak Chia or some of the more scholarly authors like Thomas Cleary or Eva Wong. I haven&#039;t found my way into Eva Wong, but I must say that Cleary&#039;s translation-- down to the footnotes and commentary!-- of  &quot;The Secret of the Golden Flower&quot;, is a REVELATION. My other favorite book on Daoism, which is a kind of panoramic-view, life-scale &#039;map&#039; of practice and View, is &quot;Dragon&#039;s Play&quot;. What is unique about the latter is that it never loses sight of the principle that practice begins with, and refines, appreciation for our human nature and our place in the larger natural world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that, of the Asian &#039;old-time religions&#039;, Daoism is the least represented on bookstore shelves. Usually what you will find are books about the I-Ching, translations of the Tao Te Ching&#8211; and, if it&#039;s an unusual bookstore, maybe some of the &#039;yoga&#039; of Mantak Chia or some of the more scholarly authors like Thomas Cleary or Eva Wong. I haven&#039;t found my way into Eva Wong, but I must say that Cleary&#039;s translation&#8211; down to the footnotes and commentary!&#8211; of  &quot;The Secret of the Golden Flower&quot;, is a REVELATION. My other favorite book on Daoism, which is a kind of panoramic-view, life-scale &#039;map&#039; of practice and View, is &quot;Dragon&#039;s Play&quot;. What is unique about the latter is that it never loses sight of the principle that practice begins with, and refines, appreciation for our human nature and our place in the larger natural world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoelG</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=1618#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>A quick note: Ray&#039;s residential community, which I described generically as &quot;collaborative housing,&quot; is part of the CoHousing movement. This is a really cool trend. More info is available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cohousing.org&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.cohousing.org&lt;/a&gt;. Here&#039;s a basic description:

&quot;Cohousing is a type of collaborative housing in which residents actively participate in the design and operation of their own neighborhoods. Cohousing residents are consciously committed to living as a community. The physical design encourages both social contact and individual space. Private homes contain all the features of conventional homes, but residents also have access to extensive common facilities such as open space, courtyards, a playground and a common house.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick note: Ray&#039;s residential community, which I described generically as &quot;collaborative housing,&quot; is part of the CoHousing movement. This is a really cool trend. More info is available at <a href="http://www.cohousing.org" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.cohousing.org</a>. Here&#039;s a basic description:</p>
<p>&quot;Cohousing is a type of collaborative housing in which residents actively participate in the design and operation of their own neighborhoods. Cohousing residents are consciously committed to living as a community. The physical design encourages both social contact and individual space. Private homes contain all the features of conventional homes, but residents also have access to extensive common facilities such as open space, courtyards, a playground and a common house.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larryang</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>larryang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 19:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=1618#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>Hate to use labels, but the term Chan (Zen) come to mind...

Anyway, at least in Taiwan, many temples have a Taoist, folk and Buddhist shrines in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to use labels, but the term Chan (Zen) come to mind&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, at least in Taiwan, many temples have a Taoist, folk and Buddhist shrines in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @UUKady</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>@UUKady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=1618#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this book when I read it first. It&#039;s time to take a second look. Thank you for the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this book when I read it first. It&#039;s time to take a second look. Thank you for the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/2010/07/relax-you%e2%80%99re-already-home/#comment-2873</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buddhistgeeks.com/?p=1618#comment-2873</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this - I&#039;ll check this out. It makes me consider the fact that much of our understanding of Buddhism is derived from East Asian Buddhism, which is really a sort of Taoist-Buddhist gumbo that may no be entirely compatible with Indic traditions. I think there is something to be learned from the Taoist side of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this &#8211; I&#039;ll check this out. It makes me consider the fact that much of our understanding of Buddhism is derived from East Asian Buddhism, which is really a sort of Taoist-Buddhist gumbo that may no be entirely compatible with Indic traditions. I think there is something to be learned from the Taoist side of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

